The US system aka social security is based on, not only the life-long participation of the pension receiver, but the system integration with younger participants as well continually infusing new funds into the system. That seems to be the crucial element in these "modern" times.

Given the numbers of particiants in the "reproductive rights" universe...and the length of time it has been going on, another element in the birth rate scenario which is growing exponentially in these "modern" times.

Most Pension Systems are set up under financial models not political ones. Making the issue of "reproductive rights" invisible to the "numbers". Yes we are living longer, a lot longer than in the 1930's, but our society is more intent on elimination of the "unwanted" than the inclusion of the rights of the long term participants.

So, social security does not really exist? Or is it just invisible. You have a lot of resteems, which looks like the content has struck some kind of chord, and your readers are interested in the solution.

Of which more government is not one. but neither are the rights of women. Aging is a birth deffect. As long as it is untreated it will continue to plague the financial/pension system. The power of such a system is based on actuarial integrity. Not political integrity. Government has no place in a pension system because it is self serving it seems. In other words, political.

Posted using Partiko Android