RE: Should We Introduce a Curation Reward Slider?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Should We Introduce a Curation Reward Slider?

akomoajong in #dpoll • 6 years ago

I equally think it wouldn't solve any of those issues you pointed out.

Still, 75% wouldn't encourage organic voting because the system will still look the same for those who cycle jerk and exchange votes as they still get and equal treatment among themselves.

Moreover, at 75% curation, we would see more curation snipping bots and spam voting bots (like these accounts that have voted your comment). I mean bid bots will simply be replaced by more of these bots. I can picture seeing posts with 1k+ upvotes having something $0.01.

Posted using Partiko Android

6 years ago in #dpoll by akomoajong

0.00 BPC

1 vote

Sort:

Trending

[-]

geekgirl 6 years ago

You bring up a good point, that votes on posts and comments should have different structure.

I think with 75% curation reward people will be more likely put in their live savings into steem instead of other investment options which in return increase the price of steem and more votes for authors. At 75% curation there is no need to invest in bidbots. In this case investors will be more interested in steem working organically because it will increase the the value of their investment.

But this will never happen. People are focused on short term gains.

0.00 BPC

5 votes

[-]

dera123 6 years ago

75% curation reward could have a huge impact on authors and their rewards. The question is if there will be less posts because the rewards. The voting amount won't be bigger and getting only 1/3 of the former rewards can be hard.

Posted using Partiko Android

0.00 BPC

4 votes