The economy is important to me. Because the most important thing for the development of an ecosystem is the expansion of the economy. Bot services can be bad. Then you can take precautions. But it is very sad to give the economy to whales.

The most important thing in a social media is the number of content. What is the sustainability of the platform with the decrease in the number of content after this development? If this HF is realized, the steem economy will quickly collapse. I hope this mistake is returned.

The change here is not for the price rise. Monopolization of the economy. Because the supply of steem will not be reduced in any way. As the curators vote, the steem will continue to be generated. As a result, there will be no significant change in the amount of supply. But most of the power will be taken by whales. Then we'll see to have bigger losses here.

If you want the price to rise in the market. Let's lock down the amount of SBD in the prizes for a while, just like in Steem. Just get it available when power down is done. Same as steem power down. Thus, it becomes more equitable approach to the economy.

I look at this situation as an researcher of economy. And if this happens, the collapse of the economy will be inevitable. I hope I would be wrong.