RE: President Trump has been impeached for Nothing; by domestic enemies of our Republic!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: President Trump has been impeached for Nothing; by domestic enemies of our Republic!

smithlabs in #informationwar • 5 years ago

EVERY government communication is redacted for classified information, DUH! That does not affect the conversation that was NOT classified where The Ukrainian President brought up this problem and ask for help with it.

This was needed, because our Ambassador Refused to do her job, and pass on the information to the DOJ!

https://steemit.com/informationwar/@smithlabs/us-ambassador-yovanovitch-perjured-herself-and-denied-visa-to-witnesses-to-obstruct-justice-and-protect-other-liberals

It also amazes me that liberals take as gospel testamony from someone that was not involved, who quoted what he heard from a second individual. It turns out that the second person was NOT on the call either! This is hearsay of hearsay, and ONE level is not considered evidence in any court!

Except maybe the Kangaroo court that Schiff set up, I call BS! When the Senate does their Job, and checks the legal accuracy of the "Crime" under Constitutional Law, it will die the death it deserves....

This will haunt the DNC in next years election! Ironically, if they had not gone nuclear with perjury on Kavanaugh, they would not have lost the Senate seats they need now!

Perjury is becoming less effective as a political tool, as voters understand that they are minions of the Father of all lies; and the only thing they have to offer is lies supported by lies....

When this is shown to be the feces it is, we should Bill the DNC for the $46,000,000.00 they wasted, knowing there was Nothing from the start! They knew they were wasting this money and time, so billing them is fair....

>:(

5 years ago in #informationwar by smithlabs

0.00 BPC

2 votes

Sort:

Trending

[-]

preparedwombat 5 years ago (edited)

As a wild guess, a few decades from now you’ll probably still be fuming at how unkind history has been to Donald J Trump.

I have no idea where Trump supporters came up with the idea that Articles of Impeachment are supposed to have any relationship to the criminal code.

If anything, Trump got off easy with only two Articles of Impeachent. Andrew Johnson’s 10th Article reads like it could have been written with Trump in mind:
“That said Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, unmindful of the high duties of his high office and the dignity and proprieties thereof, and of the harmony and courtesies which ought to exist and be maintained between the executive and legislative branches of the Government of the United States, designing and intending to set aside the rightful authorities and powers of Congress, did attempt to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach, the Congress of the United States, and the several branches thereof, to impair and destroy the regard and respect of all the good people of the United States for the Congress and the legislative power thereof, which all officers of the government ought inviolably to preserve and maintain, and to excite the odium and resentment of all good people of the United States against Congress and the laws by it duly and constitutionally enacted; and in pursuance of his said design and intent, openly and publicly and before divers assemblages of citizens of the United States, convened in divers parts thereof, to meet and receive said Andrew Johnson as the Chief Magistrate of the United States, did, on the eighteenth day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-six, and on divers other days and times, as well before as afterwards, make and declare, with a loud voice, certain intemperate, inflammatory and scandalous harangues, and therein utter loud threats and bitter menaces, as well against Congress as the laws of the United States duly enacted thereby, amid the cries, jeers and laughter of the multitudes then assembled in hearing, which are set forth in the several specifications hereinafter written...”

0.00 BPC

1 vote

[-]

smithlabs 5 years ago

What amazes me is that you haven't read the Constitution. It is SPECIFIC, that a Crime has to occur to Impeach. That is why the check of teh Senate to Verify said crime was put in place. Ignorance is a poor place to live....

It also surprises me that President Trump is not guilty of crimes someone else did over a century ago. It shouldn't surprise me, but it does. In the grand scheme of things, I guess he is as "guilty of those 'crimes'; as the current articles!

YOU CAN NOT Impeach a President, just because you hate him, THAT is just Not there!

:)>

0.00 BPC

2 votes

[-]

preparedwombat 5 years ago

What amazes me is that you haven't read the Constitution.

Yes, I have.

It is SPECIFIC, that a Crime has to occur to Impeach.

No, it doesn’t.

You keep claiming that things which are not facts are facts. I see no point in continuing this thread.

0.00 BPC

1 vote

[-]

smithlabs 5 years ago

You need to read it again...But be careful, you start thinking and you will become a Conservative, LOL!.

Even that Idiot Pelosi Knows there is nothing here. She has painted herself into a corner, and is trying to withhold the Articles of Impeachment from the Senate! She has realized that they will verify Facts of these Articles. She knows this will finish the process; as there is Nothing there!

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/12/19/cruz-dems-in-a-panic-because-in-the-last-month-their-case-collapsed/

Here is a synopsis on High Crimes Etc. From the Constitution Society

https://constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm

THEY say there Must be a crime! But I guess you are smarter than these guys too....

The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors". I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word "high". It does not mean "more serious". It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under, and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.

Sorry both Articles are Crap, to be flushed by the Senate.

:)>

0.00 BPC

2 votes