Hello again, @virtualgrowth
We did our best to try to do the White Paper as complete, transparent and full of figures and numbers as possible, at the same time that we intended that all that data was understandable by people and there would be no misunderstandings, as there have been (although some of them have been on purpose by some paid persons).
We also tried our best answering every question here (although here more than ask us we have been directly accused) and every accusation, with arguments and trying to make people understand the advantages that they supposedly did not see, did not understand or did not want to see.
We also disproved all the illegitimate and free accusations that a Rep.74 user made about us here: https://steemit.com/steemleo/@the.circle/re-xyzashu-pvt41b
We honestly do not know what else to do or say about it, because I think that among all the answers we have given to people in the comments and that we believe that our White Paper is quite broad and well explained, there should be some clarity regarding our good Intentions and our project model, which is not, at all, neither selfish nor, much less, a scam.
We just try to contribute our grain of sand to help the community.
We're still open to anyone who still have any concrete doubt about anything; we will kindly answer and explain it, point per point, if such doubt is not deductible from the White Paper.
I think we just deserved some more respect and less free accusations when we truly go to community with a White Paper and a project with a lot of work behind.
If we had some bad intentions, we would not have promoted ourselves in this way, nor would we have taken out so much exposed data as we have already done.
As said, we've tried our best.
Have a nice day.