RE: Is HF21 a trap?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is HF21 a trap?

baah in #witness • 6 years ago

They don't lose 10%, and it seems you have no problem with curation cutting entirely into author rewards more than twice that since you can cash in on that, plus this has absolutely nothing to do with Facebook and how in the world would you restrict their spending, since when is crypto at all about limiting how much others can spend and where do you get off thinking that a mob, what you refer to as "community" has any right to impose your arbitrary limits and finally how do you figure that the SPS has anything to do with steemit selling their coins?

The nerve some people have.

6 years ago in #witness by baah

0.00 BPC

2 votes

Sort:

Trending

[-]

bitcoinflood 6 years ago

Never said sps was part of steemits spending. U can't sit there and think that steemit the company has not been dragging down prices with their massive sells each month. The market cap is only a few million on steem so it plays a huge factor. They have acomphished near nothing with the money they have blown. If u say they haven't then u must be missing a few screws.

Posted using Partiko Android

0.00 BPC

[-]

baah 6 years ago (edited)

Here you are, in the ultimate wisdom of "but there must be something we can do to limit how much users can sell".
I'm the one missing screws though, and because you don't know how much work they are doing that means that they're not doing work. Keep on talking shit about steemit, it's the most popular thing to do, literally as original as harping on ze whalez.

0.00 BPC

[-]

baah 6 years ago

Never said sps was part of steemits spending.

As if I said anything to that effect. This is what you said:

I still don't like the fact that the content creators lose another 10% > > > > while the company simply continues to cash in left and right.

And I said:

how do you figure that the SPS has anything to do with > > > steemit selling their coins?

Because you tied one into the other, implicating that one has something to do with the other.

0.00 BPC