Here's something, the absence of visible development is not necessarily even the indication of such an absence. It's my spin on "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence". If you couldn't decypher the other one: it does not matter if one person tries to censor others from selling their coins, or a whole "community", it's not the right thing, and the means never justify the ends.
Posted using Partiko Android
Well I am not saying restrictions be put on their funds. That I agree is not right. But just like with any investment such as stocks u have a vote. With dpos u don't. It's more of a government structure and we know how much money governments love to blow.
Posted using Partiko Android
Well I am not saying restrictions be put on their funds
It literally makes no sense why we as a community of users can't restrict their spending and their rewards they are getting for such little work and such flat out in my opinion disrespect to all the members on steemit.
Literally what you expressed, go find you a screwdriver or something that can tune up those things you call brains.
(I'm all three dudes right now)
Really puzzles me how u go through life with such the aditude lol good luck with that enjoy your weekend.
Posted using Partiko Android
Yeah but you're probably as puzzled by that as in thinking with what you were going to do to evade exactly what you said just now when you tried to make it as if my attitude was what we were discussing. In other words, project much "my shit don't stink"?
Nah just a Miss understanding on ur part which is very common online. Restricting them would mean reduced funds the company earns because the community voted on it as a change. Steems price will struggle if there is needless spending and the community should be able to vote more and have direction.
Steemit is steem they are suppose to do the development work. They haven't been and still lack to make much movement. They spend time on dumb updates instead of listening to the community as they should since each person here is in essence a stock holder in the company.
But I can see from ur other posts u just like to bitch and moan so after this post u will no longer be a waste of my time.
Posted using Partiko Android
Restricting them would mean reduced funds the company earns because the community voted on it as a change.
What are you talking about? What funds? How can the mob vote on that? Clearly you were talking about "the selling pressure" and you are now trying to twist it, which if not you can explain exactly what funds you want the community to restrict, but I'm 100% certain you can't and will anticipate your floundering or evasion as you've done thus far, like the tidbit I said about the apparent lack of development not being a lack of development (read: apparent).
They spend time on dumb updates
Lol what a moron. No need to respond to anything moron, I know you are a moron now.
Well I am not saying restrictions be put on their funds
Dumdum dum
It literally makes no sense why we as a community of users can't restrict their spending
B.
O no, the moron downvoted me after accusing me of misunderstanding what "restrict their spending" means, thank you for making me smile, I revel knowing that the post I wrote a few days ago about your ilk hit a proverbial nerve, proverbial because you're a fucking moron and nerves are as rare to you, as rare as integrity is to a pathetic liar that thinks his shit don't stink, telling others they misunderstood what he had literally expressed in three different ways.
O what's that moron, not gonna engage this waste of your time, lol.