#governance #DHF
I suggest to base the DHF votes not just by stake owned but also by the no. of posts written in the last 12 months. We could have then maybe more meaningful initiatives funded.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
Greetings @stayoutoftherz ,
Sounds like something that would be quite helpful in making the DHF decisions.....thank you!
Kind Regards,
Bleujay
This would just make people use spambots generating random long posts in order to get more influence.
We all should simply care more about our governance duty.
Those spam posts would not get upvotes and could be easily filtered out.
Why wouldn't they? If you'll create a farm of spambots, you can let them upvote each other.
Keeping things simple is the best way imho. More and more rules and regulations would only open new ways how to cheat on the system.
I know, it could get tricky with the implementation. But it sucks that money is dumped in dubious projects like rally cars, racing bikes and even non-existing boreholes.
It's just sad we as a community support the Valueplan proposals. Changing the rules would hardly affect this.
That would have some surprising results, I think ... requiring that proposals be put forth not only in English but in at least Spanish and German, thereby covering Hive's top three most active language groups, would also change things because of more accessibility.