But who is we?

Potential investors should at least know reputation of founder(s) if the projection is centralized, which it is, by your reply.

Of course users can still choose to invest without knowing founders for a centralised project, but at least they should be warned of the risks.

For example, you could make a statement saying something like:

Investment Risk
#LeoStrategy is a centralised project. The @leostrategy account keys are held by a single user who wishes to remain anonymous (if that is so), so there is a definite risk that there could be a rug-pull causing loss of all funds.

@asgarth, #feedback, can we please have a feature whereby we can subscribe to a post and/or comment so we can be notified of further replies. i think this option could vastly increase user engagement.

@ecency offers this option partially, by booknarking a post or comment, but really it's bookmark and subscribe. i think it would be better if these are separated so users realise the option. What i did here is copy link to @acidyo's re. his and my concerns as a reply to each of the previous commenters so they are aware of the concerns. This is a clumsy workaround though, adding unnecessary comments to the chain. It would be very good for increased engagement if when commenting, a user is automatically subscribed (like Fakebook does) with option not to subscribe in settings, but still having pop-up befire posting asking if user wishes to subscribe to the post (or comment) to which they are replying with choice to subscribe or not to furtjer replies amd additional choice to subscribe to further replies to those comments. Understand?