What @stayoutoftherz wrote; You can not choose who votes for you.
These accounts are voting regularly for other people, too.
Yet, you are only flagging those, who voice certain political opinions.
for example: @double-u never got flagged by you, never had to join your Discord.
Your informants have a political bias and will only report people they do not like.
It appeared that these accounts have been created by isabellaklais as they were originally only voted her.
In such case I will remove her from mack bot and only leave these accounts on mack bot. Thanks for pointing out
It appeared that these accounts have been created by isabellaklais as they were originally only voted her.
How so ? You are pretty much lying now.
It would appear like they had been created by someone close to @steem-bootcamp.
For the alleged 'farming', they used a total of less than 1k SP.
The blacklisting resulted in her posts being downvoted to 0.0$.
The blacklist now gets shared with other groups.
The consequences can be quite substantial and such power should not be taken lightly.
Since you only cared for those accounts that voice certain political opinions, your bias has clearly shown. Everything points to someone abusing their position to silence political enemies, hiding behind the anonymity of your bot accounts and in the Discord channel.
rules for thee, not for me.
That being said, I appreciate that you took her off your blacklist.
"Since you only cared for those accounts that voice certain political opinions, your bias has clearly shown" - tinfoil alert.
"Let's see how talking like that works out for you, should we meet again." - Threats directed at other Steemians will not be tolerated
Threats directed at other Steemians will not be tolerated
That is a threat.
Despite the name, logic does not seem to be your thing.
You don't tolerate different opinions than yours, so I am not really worried about you threatening me. You have already abused your power as much as you could and should we ever meet again, I doubt you would even bring it up.
"That is a threat."
You are clearly delusional. This evidently proves the observation "tinfoil alert" to be factual.
Refusal to tolerate threats is not a threat. Whatever logical fallacy you attempt to use to twist it other way around.
"You don't tolerate different opinions than yours, so I am not really worried about you threatening me."
Oh, yes I can apply logic well and recognize logical fallacies.
With the above response, you have proven that you are incapable of having logical conversation hence multiple use of infantile logical fallacies such as tu quoque and strawman fallacy.
Learn how to think first, then engage in conversation. Otherwise, your words sound just like annoying, robotic noise of another person who cannot communicate logically.
You left rational territory, when you started lying and insulted me.
If the idea of meeting me again and insulting me to my face feels threatening to you, I would recommend you just stop it now.
Just to give you no further chance at spinning this: I am not physically threatening you. That would be ridiculous, but seems to be exactly what you are aiming at.
You are the bullies, not me.