Well @crypto.piotr, as to what you tell me about KYC if it is something that should be implemented because it would not be weird to see that some coins that perhaps did not have the value that they expected or that are not being well treated by the market ( to say it in some way) or those that are just coming out will serve as a mattress (just in case, something unexpected in its estimated value), are selling our data to the highest bidder.

Since these data may be worth much to marketing companies and for them it would only be negotiating with something that, so to speak, will be left over from the whole process they have in operation.

And it is not necessary to go so far as I remember having read the company of the great F (Facebook and all its conglomerate) they sell certain data that they do not use, maybe in order to capitalize something more and that better database than of Facebook that has millions and millions of people in it.

While the KYC takes away a bit of the joke of what the blockchain is for a good reason for more security and that at the time of being required by law it can respond in case of theft, fraud, money laundering (which for that is the AML), etc. etc.

With what if it should reach an agreement on this and even more to cultivate users who read the terms and conditions, because let's be honest who has not just given "accept, accept" and simply because it bothers us to have to read the small letters of certain things and thus avoid falling into certain legal gaps (properly caused by ourselves when not reading said clauses) ...

No more to add a great regards to you @crypto.piotr also wishing you a great weekend and good hoping that the light does not go away when publishing this comment as it was yesterday that I was about to send and puff goodbye light :"v. God bless you