RE: Instead of answers two Ignore - Statt Antworten zwei Ignore

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Instead of answers two Ignore - Statt Antworten zwei Ignore

mein-senf-dazu in LeoFinance • 8 months ago

As stayoutoftherz said, 100$/Month should be more than enough.

For me, it's like opening the window in winter and turning the heating up to the highest setting.

A lot more money is wasted here than is gained, and the people who voted also suffer damage, which is probably not taken into consideration. It's not just about the person who created the post.

Anyone who understands the complex hive system will understand what this leads to and also what I posted today.

With the money already received, you could have made yourself independent of the proposal. The HBD that will be spent for a year would be long enough for me to be able to run something like this permanently.

Ecency and co have volunteers, why not HW?

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

8 months ago in LeoFinance by mein-senf-dazu

0.00 BPC

2 votes

Sort:

Trending

[-]

cwow2 8 months ago

100$ a month is not enough.
As I also wrote, time & effort goes into this. From what I know, HW goes through all of the users reported & the posts submitted. We have no idea the scale of that daily. But that takes a lot of time and even if HW isn't as due diligence as we would like, its still time out of someone say.
Whether they have a full time job or not on the side.

Doing this or stuff like this, on the scale HW is already doing or above should be giving a living wage + the cost of the server and whatever else is needed.

0.00 BPC

3 votes

[-]

mein-senf-dazu 8 months ago

I meant that the $100 would be more than enough for servers.

It doesn't fit that it is said that the pool is milked with the lottery, but here over 100k HBD per year are pulled out. It is out of proportion.

It would be like the state hiring tax collectors for 1 billion who end up collecting 100 million. Makes no sense at all.

And take a look at the two links in my post yesterday. I'm not sure about one of them yet, but the other one, if you think about it, is not right at all and not in the interests of the community. And also copy past or recycling, which would be worth a downvote!

And what is not taken into consideration is that downvoting posts, like kryptodenno's, also harms those who love to see his posts and therefore participate and vote voluntarily.

I don't know who, when and where decided that this type of post is not ok. Apparently a lot of people want it though and you can see from the clear vote result of almost 100% so far that HW is not doing a good job.

Thanks for taking the time to write about it, by the way.

!LUV !PGM !invest_vote

0.00 BPC

1 vote

[-]

luvshares 8 months ago

cwow2, mein-senf-dazu sent you LUV. 🙂 _(1/5) tools | trade | connect | wiki | daily

Made with LUV by crrdlx.

0.00 BPC

[-]

cwow2 8 months ago

Yes, properly 100$ would be enough for servers.
Alternative it can properly be runned via a witness server and then you just pay a fee for the server use.

I dont know about the Kryptodenno thing. As I have also said, HW isn't perfect but we lack an alternative xD

I don't think it harms the people wanted to see his posts. Because I can shitpost all I want and someone can claim they want to see shitposts, doesn't mean I should get paid for it x)

And who decides what posts to get downvoted? Well, the people who do the downvoting is deciding that.
The issue is HW getting funded, if it was just a big account downvoting Kryptodenno, they could do it simple because they didn't like his posts.

0.00 BPC